Verified

AI visibility

Which directories should my business actually be on?

Three to five verified, sector-relevant listings — fewer than you've been told, and the wrong ones cost you more than time.

When someone asks ChatGPT, Perplexity or Google's AI who to use, the engines read lists like these to decide who makes the shortlist — and your own website is what gets quoted once you're on one. So we fetched every directory worth your details, live, and wrote down the real cost, the real entry route, and the catch nobody puts on the signup page.

91 fetched live10 we'd never recommendRe-checked weeklyUK · France · US

From Ghostart, the AI visibility (GEO) platform — verified listings are the most-skipped foundation of being found by AI.

91 shown66 free or freemium56 self-serve20 already listed by default0 price withheld
Tier* Directory MarketsHow you get onWhat it costs

* Tier is our ordering, not a finding. No published study ranks listing sources this way — it is a sound order for fixing data errors (correct the source before its mirrors), standing in for suggestion order only because nothing better exists yet.

Never recommend

The ones we tell customers to stay away from

These are live, real and self-serve — which is exactly why they need naming. Each reason states what we read on the directory's own pages: observable facts, not opinions about anyone's character.

The rule, rather than the blocklist.

Reject any destination whose value proposition is volume of links rather than a record a human or an assistant would actually consult. Three tests:

  1. Would a real person land on this page from anything other than a search for the business's own name?
  2. Does the site verify the submission at all before publishing it?
  3. Is the pitch about the listing, or about the link? If the marketing leads with Domain Authority, backlinks, or a count of sites — reject.

Brownbook

Publishes an unverified entity from three fields. 44.6m listings; only name, category and country are required; no address, no phone, no verification before publication. A directory that will publish anything is not corroborating anything — it is manufacturing a citation.

UK Small Business Directory

290,000+ listings, open submission with no editorial vetting, Bronze/Silver/Gold upsell ladder.

Bizify

Free open-submission listings with "verified" sold as a paid upgrade. When verification is a product rather than a gate, the free tier carries no trust signal.

Cylex UK

Refused inspection (403 on four separate fetches), appears on essentially every bulk-submission list, and runs one subdomain per town (paisley., reading., edinburgh.) — a textbook doorway-page pattern.

chamberofcommerce.com

Not affiliated with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce despite the name. A private commercial directory borrowing the authority of a national institution, with a free listing that funnels into a 30+ site bulk-distribution trial. There is an active BBB consumer alert about Chamber-branded solicitations to small businesses.

annuaire-google.com

Passing off — trades on Google's name with no affiliation. Hard exclusion regardless of whether the site functions.

Reciprocal-backlink annuaires (Annuaire du Conseil, Meilleur du Web, Secous, Mes Annuaires, Coodoeil, WebWiki, FranceSurf, TopLien)

The tell is verbatim: "L'inscription est gratuite contre un lien retour" — free in exchange for a backlink. A directory that charges in backlinks is a PageRank scheme with a search box. Any article listing thirty-plus directories at once is describing a mass-submission ecosystem, not a curated set.

StarOfService

Lead-gen marketplace presented as a directory, with no pricing disclosed anywhere on the public site despite 180,000+ listed professionals. Trust signals: 21 reports and 96 comments on signal-arnaques.com; scamdoc rates it "Indice de confiance faible : 18 %".

Digital Agency Network (DAN)

Standard $680/yr, Gold $580/yr, Premium $1,980/yr, Platinum $2,980/yr — with listing breadth metered by price tier (Standard buys 1 city + 4 services; Platinum buys 8 cities + 16 services). No free tier and no editorial gate. The only variable is spend. This is paid link placement dressed as a directory.

Bulk "directory submission" services (500+ sites, "high DA", "get cited by AI")

The exact pattern WHAT_TO_AVOID condemns. These rank targets by Domain Authority and describe the exercise as "off-page SEO technique". Google's own spam policies list "low-quality directory or bookmark site links" as link spam. One 2026 study found only ~24.3% of bulk-submitted listings were ever indexed. The 2026 mutation — "get cited by AI answers" — is the same auto-approve farms with new copy.

No list here

Where the honest answer is that there isn't one

Padding these cells would be the easiest thing in the world and the most damaging. A short true list beats a long plausible one, and naming the empty cells is as useful as filling the full ones.

consultanciesUK0 verified rows

No dedicated management- or strategy-consultancy directory verified in any country. Falls back to the agency directories under consulting/IT-services categories.

consultanciesFR0 verified rows

As above.

consultanciesUS0 verified rows

As above.

independent retailUK2 verified rows

Stops at Yelp and Nextdoor. Bira has no consumer-facing member directory (verified). Totally Locally has no individual listing route. Faire is B2B. Etsy is a product marketplace.

independent retailFR3 verified rows

Petit Futé, Office de Tourisme and PagesJaunes. Ma Ville Mon Shopping is dead — DNS does not resolve.

independent retailUS2 verified rows

Yelp and Nextdoor. No third credible sector-specific option verified.

professional servicesUS4 verified rows

Only two involve any action (CFP Board opt-in, NAPFA membership). AIA has no public architect finder (aia.org/find-an-architect 404s) and AICPA has no public firm directory. For architects and surveyors specifically, the US cell is empty.

What to do instead. Ask your own buying question in ChatGPT and in Google. See which lists and directories come back. Claim the ones that already rank. If nothing comes back but competitors' own websites, that's your answer — there is no directory layer in your market, and your effort belongs on your own site.

One niche in full

Ski and airport transfer

Worth showing in detail because it is the sharpest example of why this research exists — roughly half of a plausible-looking candidate list turned out not to be a listing opportunity at all.

There is no ski-transfer directory. Not one. Every ski-transfer name checked — Mountain Drop-offs, Cool Bus, Alps2Alps — is an operator running its own vans. The marketplaces (Kiwitaxi, Transferz, Mozio, GetYourGuide) are supply channels where you appear as inventory inside a booking funnel, not as a named business on a citable page. The only citable rows are REVTC and the FNTV répertoire, both French-establishment-gated. For this niche the product must teach the method, not show a list.

Which five apply to you?

This page is the map. The work is narrower: the three to five rows that fit your sector, your country, your premises situation and the registrations you actually hold — with your details written once and reused identically, and each listing tracked from submitted to live. That's what Ghostart does, alongside measuring whether AI engines start reading them for your buyers' questions.

Get your five, with the copy written